You say: “that sounds expensive.” One of the things that
makes present Personal Mobility Vehicles so expensive is that they are often dedicated
to a single person. What I’m proposing can easily be shared because it can move
from one person to another, on its own, when and where it is needed.
Increasingly, my father got tired part way into a walk and
needed something to bring him back home. Later he would go walking and then
forget how to get back, so he again needed to be rescued. That meant that he
often didn’t walk, which meant he didn’t get enough exercise, and that leads to
many other problems.
Let’s look at dinner traffic in Charlestown: in the busiest dinner hour we have perhaps 500 people wanting to go to dinner, and each one takes 5 minutes of Personal Mobility Vehicle time. So each one is only using a Personal Mobility Vehicle 1/12 of the time.
Using traffic calculations, with that large a group, we get
about 1 Personal Mobility Vehicle shared among 10 people, so the cost can be
shared among 10 people. Even a heavy user probably only uses 30 minutes each day, so that’s only 1/48 of the time.
When someone isn’t being moved by the Personal Mobility
Vehicle, it can be doing other tasks, like delivering mail and flowers, moving food
and supplies, and all the other things for a thriving community.
You say: “yes but a lot of these Personal Mobility Vehicles
would have to be produced to make them economical.” Take another look at Kiva Systems. Amazon
bought them on March 19, 2012, with vast warehouses, and big plans for
speeding up delivery.
If you have followed Amazon’s Same
Day Shipping initiative, you can see that I’m not the only one thinking
this way – Amazon just hasn’t announced they are applying it to people, yet :-). And Google has also joined this delivery
race, and of course Google is already in the Autonomous Vehicle
race.
We are on the cusp of technology-enabled Personal Mobility, with
even greater changes in transportation and communities. In the next posts I’ll
lay out more of my ideas for these advances.
No comments:
Post a Comment