What if we want to go faster than the small Autonomous
Vehicles you just saw?
Power losses due to Air Resistance and Rolling Resistance
are major challenges. Weight creates additional challenges with speed, as do
safety and comfort.
Before getting into the details, here are the key points:
- Air Resistance grows rapidly with speed, and dominates losses at high speed
- Tesla achieves the lowest Air Resistance Coefficient of any regular production car, equal to the Shanghai Maglev train
- Air Resistance grows linearly with frontal area, and more slowly with length, so long vehicles can be more efficient than fat ones, which is part of the reason for long trains
- For light vehicles, like bicycles, with smooth surfaces, like wooden tracks, we can achieve Rolling Resistance at least an order of magnitude better than conventional cars and roads
- Air Resistance grows linearly with air density, so for very fast travel, it is desirable to create a partial vacuum, like Elon Musk’s Hyperloop.
The bottom line for us is that to go fast efficiently we can
design long, streamlined vehicles to run on the optimized surfaces in our
A-Ways.
Now at this point you’re probably envisioning trains where
you have to wait to get on, then search for a seat, and stop at lots of
intermediate stations before finally getting to your station, or worse yet the
train doesn’t even stop at your preferred station. You will see in subsequent posts
that we can do much better than that with Continuous Convoys and En Route
Sequencing.
Let’s start by looking at the power required to overcome losses.
Power to overcome Air Resistance grows as the cube of the speed, so it becomes
the dominant power requirement at high speeds. Power to overcome Rolling
Resistance grows linearly with speed, so this is more of a challenge at lower
speeds, and varies strongly with type of tires and road surface.
The graph below is based on the design parameters of the
Tesla, as best I can determine.
At the risk of getting too technical for some readers, we’ll
look in some detail at comparisons of Air Resistance for different designs, and
Rolling Resistance for different wheels and surfaces. You can skip to the next
section if you like.
The Coefficient of drag is a measure of how easily an object slips
through the air – Tesla has the lowest of any regular production automobile, at
0.24. Power required to overcome Air Resistance losses is the product: ½ (density
of air) x (speed)3 x (Frontal area of the Vehicle) x (Coefficient of
Drag). The density of air at sea level and 15° C is 1.225 (kg/m3).
The frontal area of the Tesla is 0.58 m2:
Pd = ½ ρ S3
A Cd
Note for the dolphin that the density of water is 800 times
higher than air, and the dolphin can’t go that fast. The density of air at
40,000 feet is only 3% that at sea level, fortunately, because the plane is
going very fast.
(http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/drag-coefficient-d_627.html
accessed 11/19/15)
Object
|
Drag Coefficient
|
Dolphin
|
0.0036
|
Subsonic Transport
Aircraft
|
0.012
|
Tesla & Shanghai
Maglev
|
0.24
|
Bird
|
0.4
|
Tractor Trailer Truck
|
0.96
|
Person standing
|
1.3
|
Motorcycle and rider
|
1.8
|
Passenger Train
|
1.8
|
The Coefficient of Rolling Resistance is a measure of how Weight
contributes to the force to push an object – The Tesla weighs about 4600 pounds.
The Power required to overcome Rolling Resistance is characterized by (Speed) x (Weight of the Vehicle) x (Coefficient
of Rolling Resistance):
Pr = S W Cr
Interestingly, Bicycle Tires on a Wooden Track are as good
as, or better than the steel wheels and tracks of Railroads. That suggests we
can achieve low Rolling Resistance for our Vehicles with optimized wheels and
A-Way surfaces. Rolling Resistance varies by a factor of 8 depending on the
road surface. Using Bicycles on a Wooden Track as an option for our light vehicles,
we can do better by a factor of 10 to 30 over conventional car tires and road
surfaces.
Wheels
|
Rolling Resistance
Coefficient
|
Railroad Steel Wheels On Steel Rails
|
0.001 - 0.002
|
Bicycle Tire On Wooden Track
|
0.001
|
Bicycle Tire On Concrete
|
0.002
|
Bicycle Tire On Asphalt Road
|
0.004
|
Bicycle Tire On Rough Paved Road
|
0.008
|
Low Resistance Tubeless Tires
|
0.002 - 0.005
|
Ordinary Car Tires On Concrete
|
0.01 - 0.015
|
Car Tires On Tar Or Asphalt
|
0.03
|
Weight is an issue not only for increasing Rolling Resistance,
but for acceleration. The energy stored in a moving Vehicle is proportional to
the Mass of the Vehicle and the square of the speed:
ES = ½ M S2
At high speeds, that’s a lot of energy stored,
and in case of a crash the energy has to go somewhere. That’s why cars have the
crumple zones, air bags, heavy frames, heavy brakes, and many other features. And since the energy grows as the square of the speed,
you can see why even going a bit faster is a lot more dangerous.
That’s partly why our designs include so many features to prevent crashes before they can
happen.
Otherwise, this energy of motion is only a major issue if
you are trying to go very fast, or if you start and stop a lot. Fortunately, it
is possible to get most of that stored energy back when decelerating through
regenerative braking. You will see how our techniques are particularly
efficient at this recovery. Of course,
we can’t recover the losses from Air Resistance and Rolling Resistance because
they go to heating the vehicle and the environment.
Another issue with higher speeds is other accelerations. For
example, a “small” bump or “slight” turn may be barely noticeable at low speed
but can be significant, or even disastrous at higher speeds. So the higher the
speed, the flatter, smoother, and straighter the A-Way surface needs to be. You
can “bank the curves” so you are pressed into your seat rather than thrown
sideways, but the proper banking depends on the speed.
One of the criticisms of
trying to use existing highway right-of-ways for high speed transportation, like
the Hyperloop, is that they have lots of hills and curves, which aren’t a
problem at 65 mph, but are bothersome at 120 mph, and disastrous at 300 mph.
When we get to more detail on A-Way design, you will see how
we work with all these issues.
In the next post we’ll look at vehicles for higher speeds.